banner



Home  ›  Which Hominid Had The Largest Brain Size Measured In Cc (Cubic Centimeters)?

Which Hominid Had The Largest Brain Size Measured In Cc (Cubic Centimeters)?

Written By Friday, April 15, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Topic of study

The size of the brain is a frequent topic of study within the fields of beefcake, biological anthropology, brute scientific discipline and evolution. Brain size is sometimes measured past weight and sometimes past book (via MRI scans or by skull book). Neuroimaging intelligence testing can be used to written report the volumetric measurements of the brain. Regarding "intelligence testing", a question that has been oftentimes investigated is the relation of encephalon size to intelligence. This question is quite controversial and will be addressed further in the department on intelligence. The measure of brain size and cranial capacity is not just important to humans, merely to all mammals.

Humans [edit]

In humans, the right cerebral hemisphere is typically larger than the left, whereas the cerebellar hemispheres are typically closer in size. The adult human being brain weighs on boilerplate about one.five kg (3.iii lb).[ane] In men the boilerplate weight is about 1370 thousand and in women about 1200 g.[2] The volume is around 1260  cmiii in men and 1130  cm3 in women, although there is substantial individual variation.[3] Yet another study argued that adult human encephalon weight is i,300-one,400g for adult humans and 350-400g for newborn humans. At that place is a range of volume and weights, and non but 1 number that 1 can definitively rely on, every bit with torso mass. It is as well important to annotation that variation betwixt individuals is not as important as variation inside species, equally overall the differences are much smaller. The mechanisms of interspecific and intraspecific variation as well differ.

Variation and development [edit]

From early primates to hominids and finally to Homo sapiens, the brain is progressively larger, with exception of extinct Neanderthals whose brain size exceeded modern Homo sapiens. The volume of the human brain has increased equally humans accept evolved (see Homininae), starting from almost 600 cm3 in Homo habilis up to 1680 cm3 in Homo neanderthalensis, which was the hominid with the biggest brain size.[iv] The increase in brain size stopped with neanderthals. Since then, the average encephalon size has been shrinking over the past 28,000 years.[5] I study suggests that this decrease in brain size "was surprisingly contempo, occurring in the last 3,000 years", not the past 28,000 years.[6] The cranial capacity has decreased from around 1,550 cm3 to effectually ane,440 cmiii in males while the female cranial capacity has shrunk from around 1,500 cmiii to around 1,240 cm3.[7] Other sources with bigger sample sizes of mod Homo sapiens find approximately the same cranial capacity for males but a higher cranial capacity of around 1330 cm3 in females.[eight]

Trends in hominin brain size evolution[six]

Brain sizes of hominids
Name Brain size (cmthree)[ix]
Homo habilis 550–687
Homo ergaster 700–900
Homo erectus 600–1250
Human being heidelbergensis 1100–1400
Homo neanderthalensis 1200–1750
Human sapiens 1400
Homo floresiensis 417 [10]

H. floresiensis' small brain [edit]

Human being floresiensis is a hominin from the island of Flores in Indonesia with fossils dating from 60,000-100,000 years ago.[11] Despite its relatively derived position in the hominin phylogeny, CT imaging of its skull reveals that that its brain volume was just 417 cmiii,[10] less than that of fifty-fifty Human being habilis, which is believed to take gone extinct far before (around i.65 meg years ago.[12]). The reason for this regression in brain size is believed to be island syndrome [13] in which the brains of insular species get smaller due to reduced predation risk. This is beneficial as it reduces the basal metabolic rate without meaning increases in predation take a chance.[14]

Genetic causes of recent subtract [edit]

In recent years, experiments have been conducted drawing conclusions to encephalon size in clan to the factor mutation that causes microcephaly, a neural developmental disorder that affects cognitive cortical book.[15]

Sociocultural causes of recent decrease [edit]

A 2021 study proposed that the contempo decrease in encephalon size in the last 3,000 years has resulted from externalization of cognition and group controlling, partly via the advent of social systems of distributed cognition, social organization, division of labor and sharing of information.[16] [6]

Hydrocephalus [edit]

Exceptional cases of hydrocephalus, such as what was reported by John Lorber in 1980 and by a study with rats,[17] [18] suggest that relatively high levels of intelligence and relatively normal functioning are possible even with very small brains.[19] [20] It is unclear what conclusions could be fatigued from such reports – such as about brain capacities, redundancies, mechanics and size requirements.

Biogeographic variation [edit]

Efforts to find racial or ethnic variation in brain size are generally considered to be a pseudoscientific effort[21] [22] [23] and have traditionally been tied to scientific racism and attempts to demonstrate a racial intellectual hierarchy.[23] [24] [25] [26]

The majority of efforts to demonstrate this accept relied on indirect data that assessed skull measurements equally opposed to straight brain observations. These are considered scientifically discredited.[24] [27]

A big-scale 1984 survey of global variation in skulls has concluded that variation in skull and head sizes is unrelated to race, merely rather climatic oestrus preservation, stating "Nosotros find little back up for the use of brain size in taxonomic assessment (other than with paleontological extremes over time). Racial taxonomies which include cranial chapters, caput shape, or any other trait influenced by climate confound ecotypic and phyletic causes. For Pleistocene hominids, we dubiousness that the volume of the braincase is any more taxonomically 'valuable' than any other trait."[28]

Sexual activity [edit]

Average brain weight for males and females over lifespan. From the written report Changes in brain weights during the span of human life.

A man baby'southward brain at birth averages 369 cmiii and increases, during the kickoff year of life, to nigh 961 cmiii, after which the growth rate declines. Brain volume peaks at the teenage years,[29] and subsequently the historic period of 40 it begins declining at five% per decade, speeding up around 70.[xxx] Average adult male brain weight is ane,345 grams (47.4 oz), while an adult female has an boilerplate encephalon weight of ane,222 grams (43.ane oz).[31] (This does not take into account neuron density nor brain-to-torso mass ratio; men on average also take larger bodies than women.) Males have been found to have on average greater cerebral, cerebellar and cerebral cortical lobar volumes, except peradventure left parietal.[32] The gender differences in size vary by more than specific encephalon regions. Studies have tended to indicate that men have a relatively larger amygdala and hypothalamus, while women have a relatively larger caudate and hippocampi. When covaried for intracranial volume, height, and weight, Kelly (2007) indicates women have a higher percentage of gray matter, whereas men accept a higher per centum of white affair and cerebrospinal fluid. There is loftier variability betwixt individuals in these studies, all the same.[3]

However, Yaki (2011) establish no statistically significant gender differences in the greyness matter ratio for most ages (grouped by decade), except in the 3rd and 6th decades of life in the sample of 758 women and 702 men aged 20–69.[33] The average male in their tertiary decade (ages twenty–29) had a significantly college grayness matter ratio than the average female of the aforementioned age group. In contrast, amongst subjects in their sixth decade, the average woman had a significantly larger gray matter ratio, though no meaningful difference was establish among those in their 7th decade of life.

Total cerebral and grayness matter volumes peak during the ages from 10–20 years (before in girls than boys), whereas white matter and ventricular volumes increase. There is a general pattern in neural development of babyhood peaks followed by adolescent declines (e.g. synaptic pruning). Consistent with adult findings, average cerebral volume is approximately x% larger in boys than girls. Yet, such differences should not be interpreted as imparting whatever sort of functional advantage or disadvantage; gross structural measures may not reflect functionally relevant factors such as neuronal connectivity and receptor density, and of note is the high variability of brain size even in narrowly defined groups, for example children at the same age may take as much as a fifty% differences in full brain book.[34] Young girls have on average relative larger hippocampal volume, whereas the amygdalae are larger in boys.[3] Notwithstanding, multiple studies[35] [36] accept found a higher synaptic density in males: a 2008 study reported that men had a significantly college average synaptic density of 12.9 × 108 per cubic millimeter, whereas in women it was 8.six × 108 per cubic millimeter, a 33% difference. Other studies have institute an average of 4 billion more neurons in the male encephalon,[37] corroborating this difference, as each neuron has on average seven,000 synaptic connections to other neurons.

Significant dynamic changes in brain structure take place through adulthood and aging, with substantial variation betwixt individuals. In later decades, men bear witness greater volume loss in whole brain book and in the frontal lobes, and temporal lobes, whereas in women at that place is increased book loss in the hippocampi and parietal lobes.[three] Men show a steeper reject in global grey matter volume, although in both sexes it varies by region with some areas exhibiting little or no age effect. Overall white thing volume does not appear to refuse with historic period, although there is variation betwixt encephalon regions.[38]

Genetic contribution [edit]

Adult twin studies have indicated high heritability estimates for overall brain size in machismo (between 66% and 97%). The effect varies regionally inside the brain, however, with high heritabilities of frontal lobe volumes (90-95%), moderate estimates in the hippocampi (40-69%), and ecology factors influencing several medial brain areas. In addition, lateral ventricle volume appears to be mainly explained by environmental factors, suggesting such factors also play a role in the surrounding brain tissue. Genes may cause the association betwixt encephalon structure and cognitive functions, or the latter may influence the former during life. A number of candidate genes have been identified or suggested, simply they await replication.[39] [40]

Intelligence [edit]

Studies demonstrate a correlation between brain size and intelligence, larger brains predicting higher intelligence. It is however non clear if the correlation is causal.[41] The majority of MRI studies study moderate correlations around 0.iii to 0.four between encephalon volume and intelligence.[42] [43] The virtually consistent associations are observed inside the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes, the hippocampus, and the cerebellum, simply simply account for a relatively small amount of variance in IQ, which suggests that while encephalon size may exist related to human intelligence, other factors also play a role.[43] [44] In addition, brain volumes do not correlate strongly with other and more than specific cognitive measures.[45] In men, IQ correlates more with gray matter book in the frontal lobe and parietal lobe, which is roughly involved in sensory integration and attending, whereas in women information technology correlates with grey matter volume in the frontal lobe and Broca'south area, which is involved in linguistic communication.[3]

Research measuring brain volume, P300 auditory evoked potentials, and intelligence shows a dissociation, such that both brain volume and speed of P300 correlate with measured aspects of intelligence, but non with each other.[46] [47] Evidence conflicts on the question of whether encephalon size variation also predicts intelligence between siblings, as some studies discover moderate correlations and others detect none.[41] A recent review by Nesbitt, Flynn et al. (2012) point out that crude encephalon size is unlikely to be a good mensurate of IQ, for case brain size likewise differs betwixt men and women, but without well documented differences in IQ.[41]

A discovery in recent years is that the structure of the adult homo brain changes when a new cognitive or motor skill, including vocabulary, is learned.[48] Structural neuroplasticity (increased gray affair volume) has been demonstrated in adults after three months of training in a visual-motor skill, equally the qualitative modify (i.eastward. learning of a new task) appear more critical for the brain to change its construction than continued training of an already-learned task. Such changes (eastward.g. revising for medical exams) have been shown to last for at to the lowest degree 3 months without further practicing; other examples include learning novel speech sounds, musical power, navigation skills and learning to read mirror-reflected words.[49] [50]

Other animals [edit]

The largest brains are those of sperm whales, weighing virtually 8 kg (xviii lb). An elephant's brain weighs just over 5 kg (xi lb), a bottlenose dolphin's 1.5 to 1.seven kg (3.iii to 3.seven lb), whereas a human encephalon is around 1.3 to ane.5 kg (2.nine to three.three lb). Brain size tends to vary according to body size. The relationship is not proportional, though: the encephalon-to-trunk mass ratio varies. The largest ratio found is in the shrew.[51] Averaging encephalon weight across all orders of mammals, information technology follows a power law, with an exponent of about 0.75.[52] There are good reasons to await a power law: for case, the body-size to trunk-length human relationship follows a power law with an exponent of 0.33, and the torso-size to surface-expanse relationship follows a ability law with an exponent of 0.67. The explanation for an exponent of 0.75 is not obvious; however, it is worth noting that several physiological variables appear to be related to body size by approximately the aforementioned exponent—for case, the basal metabolic rate.[53]

This power law formula applies to the "average" brain of mammals taken as a whole, but each family (cats, rodents, primates, etc.) departs from it to some caste, in a style that more often than not reflects the overall "sophistication" of beliefs.[54] Primates, for a given body size, have brains 5 to 10 times equally large as the formula predicts. Predators tend to have relatively larger brains than the animals they casualty on; placental mammals (the slap-up majority) have relatively larger brains than marsupials such equally the opossum. A standard measure for assessing an animal's brain size compared to what would exist expected from its body size is known every bit the encephalization quotient. The encephalization caliber for humans is between 7.4-seven.8.[55]

When the mammalian brain increases in size, not all parts increment at the same rate.[56] In particular, the larger the encephalon of a species, the greater the fraction taken upward by the cortex. Thus, in the species with the largest brains, most of their volume is filled with cortex: this applies non but to humans, but likewise to animals such as dolphins, whales or elephants. The evolution of Human sapiens over the by ii million years has been marked by a steady increase in brain size, just much of it can be accounted for by corresponding increases in body size.[57] There are, yet, many departures from the trend that are difficult to explain in a systematic way: in particular, the advent of modern man about 100,000 years agone was marked by a decrease in trunk size at the same time as an increase in encephalon size. Yet, it is noteworthy that Neanderthals, which became extinct almost xl,000 years ago, had larger brains than modern Homo sapiens.[58]

Not all investigators are happy with the corporeality of attention that has been paid to brain size. Roth and Dicke, for instance, take argued that factors other than size are more highly correlated with intelligence, such every bit the number of cortical neurons and the speed of their connections.[59] Moreover, they signal out that intelligence depends not just on the amount of brain tissue, only on the details of how information technology is structured. Information technology is also well known that crows, ravens, and grey parrots are quite intelligent even though they take pocket-size brains.

While humans have the largest encephalization caliber of extant animals, information technology is not out of line for a primate.[60] [61] Some other anatomical trends are correlated in the man evolutionary path with encephalon size: the basicranium becomes more flexed with increasing brain size relative to basicranial length.[62]

Cranial capacity [edit]

Cranial capacity is a measure of the volume of the interior of the skull of those vertebrates who have a brain. The most commonly used unit of measure is the cubic centimetre (cmthree). The volume of the attic is used equally a rough indicator of the size of the brain, and this in turn is used every bit a rough indicator of the potential intelligence of the organism. Cranial capacity is often tested by filling the cranial cavity with drinking glass beads and measuring their book, or by CT scan imaging.[63] [64] A more accurate way of measuring cranial capacity, is to make an endocranial cast and measure the amount of water the cast displaces. In the past at that place have been dozens of studies done to guess cranial capacity on skulls. About of these studies have been washed on dry skull using linear dimensions, packing methods or occasionally radiological methods.[ citation needed ]

Knowledge of the volume of the cranial cavity can exist important information for the study of unlike populations with various differences like geographical, racial, or indigenous origin. Other things can also affect cranial capacity such as diet.[65] It is too used to written report correlating betwixt cranial chapters with other cranial measurements and in comparing skulls from different beings. It is commonly used to study abnormalities of cranial size and shape or aspects of growth and development of the volume of the brain.[ citation needed ] Cranial capacity is an indirect approach to test the size of the brain. A few studies on cranial capacity have been done on living beings through linear dimensions.[ citation needed ]

Still, larger cranial chapters is non always indicative of a more than intelligent organism, since larger capacities are required for decision-making a larger trunk, or in many cases are an adaptive feature for life in a colder surroundings. For instance, amongst modern Homo sapiens, northern populations have a 20% larger visual cortex than those in the southern breadth populations, and this potentially explains the population differences in human being brain size (and roughly cranial capacity).[66] [67] Neurological functions are determined more than by the system of the brain rather than the book. Individual variability is also of import when because cranial chapters, for example the average Neanderthal cranial capacity for females was 1300 cmiii and 1600 cm3 for males.[68] Neanderthals had larger eyes and bodies relative to their height, thus a disproportionately large expanse of their brain was defended to somatic and visual processing, functions not normally associated with intelligence. When these areas were adjusted to match anatomically modernistic human being proportions information technology was found Neanderthals had brains xv-22% smaller than in anatomically-modernistic humans.[69] When the neanderthal version of the NOVA1 gene is inserted into stem cells it creates neurons with less synapses than stem cells containing the human version.[70]

Parts of a cranium found in China in the 1970s show that the young human had a cranial capacity of around 1700cmthree at to the lowest degree 160,000 years ago. This is greater than the average of modern humans.[71] [72]

In an try to use cranial chapters as an objective indicator of brain size, the encephalization quotient (EQ) was developed in 1973 by Harry Jerison. It compares the size of the brain of the specimen to the expected brain size of animals with roughly the same weight.[73] This mode a more objective judgement can be made on the cranial capacity of an individual animal. A large scientific collection of brain endocasts and measurements of cranial capacity has been compiled past Holloway.[74]

Examples of cranial capacity

Apes

  • Orangutans: 275–500 cm3 (16.8–30.5 cu in)
  • Chimpanzees: 275–500 cm3 (16.eight–30.5 cu in)
  • Gorillas: 340–752 cmthree (20.7–45.ix cu in)

Hominids

  • Anatomically-modern human: average 1473cm3 [69]
  • Neanderthals: 1500-|1740cmiii
  • Xujiayao half-dozen (160 to 200 ka ago): ca. 1700cm3 [71] [72]
  • Homo erectus; 850 – 1100 cmthree
  • Australopithecus anamensis; 365–370 cm3 [75]
  • Australopithecus afarensis; 438 cm3 [76]
  • Australopithecus africanus 452 cm3 [77]
  • Paranthropus boisei 521 cm3
  • Paranthropus robustus 530 cmthree

Encounter also [edit]

  • Brain-to-body mass ratio
  • Encephalization caliber
  • List of animals by number of neurons
  • Craniometry — includes historical discussion
  • Neuroscience and intelligence
  • Man brain

References [edit]

  1. ^ Parent, A; Carpenter MB (1995). "Ch. 1". Carpenter's Human Neuroanatomy. Williams & Wilkins. ISBN978-0-683-06752-1.
  2. ^ Harrison, Paul J.; Freemantle, Nick; Geddes, John R. (November 2003). "Meta-analysis of brain weight in schizophrenia". Schizophrenia Research. 64 (1): 25–34. doi:ten.1016/s0920-9964(02)00502-9. PMID 14511798. S2CID 3102745.
  3. ^ a b c d due east Cosgrove, Kelly P.; Mazure, Carolyn Thou.; Staley, Julie Yard. (October 2007). "Evolving Cognition of Sex Differences in Brain Structure, Role, and Chemistry". Biological Psychiatry. 62 (8): 847–855. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.001. PMC2711771. PMID 17544382.
  4. ^ "Neanderthal homo". infoplease.
  5. ^ McAuliffe, Kathleen (2011-01-twenty). "If Modern Humans Are So Smart, Why Are Our Brains Shrinking?". DiscoverMagazine.com . Retrieved 2014-03-05 .
  6. ^ a b c DeSilva, Jeremy K.; Traniello, James F. A.; Claxton, Alexander G.; Fannin, Luke D. (2021). "When and Why Did Human Brains Decrease in Size? A New Change-Point Analysis and Insights From Brain Evolution in Ants". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 9: 712. doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.742639. ISSN 2296-701X.
  7. ^ Henneberg, Maciej (1988). "Decrease of human skull size in the Holocene". Human Biology. 60 (iii): 395–405. JSTOR 41464021. PMID 3134287.
  8. ^ Rushton, J.Philippe (July 1992). "Cranial capacity related to sex, rank, and race in a stratified random sample of six,325 U.S. military personnel". Intelligence. sixteen (3–4): 401–413. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(92)90017-l.
  9. ^ Brownish, Graham; Fairfax, Stephanie; Sarao, Nidhi. "Human Evolution". Tree of Life. Tree of Life Project. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  10. ^ a b Falk, Dean; Hildebolt, Charles; Smith, Kirk; Morwood, M. J.; Sutikna, Thomas; Chocolate-brown, Peter; Jatmiko; Saptomo, E. Wayhu; Brunsden, Barry; Prior, Fred (8 Apr 2005). "The Brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis". Scientific discipline. 308 (5719): 242–245. doi:x.1126/science.1109727. PMID 15749690. S2CID 43166136.
  11. ^ Sutikna, Thomas; Tocheri, Matthew W.; et al. (30 March 2016). "Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Human being floresiensis at Liang Bua in Republic of indonesia". Nature. 532 (7599): 366–ix. Bibcode:2016Natur.532..366S. doi:10.1038/nature17179. PMID 27027286. S2CID 4469009.
  12. ^ F. Spoor; P. Gunz; S. Neubauer; S. Stelzer; N. Scott; A. Kwekason; M. C. Dean (2015). "Reconstructed Homo habilis type OH vii suggests deep-rooted species diversity in early Homo". Nature. 519 (7541): 83–86. Bibcode:2015Natur.519...83S. doi:x.1038/nature14224. PMID 25739632. S2CID 4470282.
  13. ^ Baeckens, Simon; Van Damme, Raoul (20 April 2020). "The island syndrome". Electric current Biological science. thirty (eight): R329–R339. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.029. PMID 32315628.
  14. ^ Herculano-Houzel, Suzana (1 March 2011). "Scaling of Brain Metabolism with a Fixed Energy Budget per Neuron: Implications for Neuronal Activeness, Plasticity and Development". PLOS ONE. 6 (3): e17514. doi:10.1371/periodical.pone.0017514. PMC3046985. PMID 21390261.
  15. ^ Kouprina, Natalay; Pavlicek, Adam; Mochida, Ganeshwaran H; Solomon, Gregory; Gersch, William; Yoon, Young-Ho; Collura, Randall; Ruvolo, Maryellen; Barrett, J. Carl; Woods, C. Geoffrey; Walsh, Christopher A; Jurka, Jerzy; Larionov, Vladimir (23 March 2004). "Accelerated Evolution of the ASPM Factor Controlling Brain Size Begins Prior to Human Brain Expansion". PLOS Biology. 2 (v): e126. doi:10.1371/periodical.pbio.0020126. PMC374243. PMID 15045028.
  16. ^ "When and why did man brains decrease in size 3,000 years ago? Ants may hold clues". phys.org . Retrieved 15 November 2021.
  17. ^ Bracci, Aria. "A rat had basically no brain—just information technology could however run across, hear, odour and feel". Northeastern University . Retrieved 22 Nov 2021.
  18. ^ Ferris, C. F.; Cai, 10.; Qiao, J.; Switzer, B.; Baun, J.; Morrison, T.; Iriah, S.; Madularu, D.; Sinkevicius, K. Westward.; Kulkarni, P. (11 November 2019). "Life without a brain: Neuroradiological and behavioral evidence of neuroplasticity necessary to sustain encephalon function in the face of severe hydrocephalus". Scientific Reports. 9 (i): 16479. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53042-three. ISSN 2045-2322.
  19. ^ Forsdyke, Donald R. (one Dec 2015). "Wittgenstein'southward Certainty is Uncertain: Brain Scans of Cured Hydrocephalics Challenge Cherished Assumptions". Biological Theory. x (4): 336–342. doi:10.1007/s13752-015-0219-x. ISSN 1555-5550.
  20. ^ "Remarkable story of maths genius who had almost no brain". The Irish Times . Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  21. ^ "Lost Inquiry Notes Articulate up Racial Bias Debate in Old Skull Size Report".
  22. ^ "The agonizing return of scientific racism". Wired UK.
  23. ^ a b Mitchell, Paul Wolff (4 October 2018). "The fault in his seeds: Lost notes to the case of bias in Samuel George Morton's cranial race science". PLOS Biology. xvi (x): e2007008. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2007008. PMC6171794. PMID 30286069. S2CID 52919024.
  24. ^ a b Gould, S. J. (1981). The Mismeasure of Homo. New York: Westward. W. Norton & Company.[ page needed ]
  25. ^ Graves, Joseph L. (September 2015). "Great Is Their Sin: Biological Determinism in the Age of Genomics". The Register of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 661 (one): 24–l. doi:10.1177/0002716215586558. S2CID 146963288.
  26. ^ Kaplan, Jonathan Michael; Pigliucci, Massimo; Banta, Joshua Alexander (i August 2015). "Gould on Morton, Redux: What tin can the debate reveal about the limits of information?". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Function C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 52: 22–31. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.001. PMID 25666493.
  27. ^ Kamin, Leon J.; Omari, Safiya (September 1998). "Race, Caput Size, and Intelligence". South African Journal of Psychology. 28 (three): 119–128. doi:x.1177/008124639802800301. S2CID 53117248.
  28. ^ Beals, Kenneth L.; Smith, Courtland 50.; Dodd, Stephen Thou.; Affections, J. Lawrence; Armstrong, Este; Blumenberg, Bennett; Girgis, Fakhry G.; Turkel, Spencer; Gibson, Kathleen R.; Henneberg, Maciej; Menk, Roland; Morimoto, Iwataro; Sokal, Robert R.; Trinkaus, Erik (June 1984). "Encephalon Size, Cranial Morphology, Climate, and Time Machines [and Comments and Reply]" (PDF). Electric current Anthropology. 25 (iii): 312. doi:10.1086/203138. S2CID 86147507.
  29. ^ Giedd, Jay N.; Blumenthal, Jonathan; Jeffries, Neal O.; Castellanos, F. X.; Liu, Hong; Zijdenbos, Alex; Paus, Tomáš; Evans, Alan C.; Rapoport, Judith L. (October 1999). "Brain evolution during babyhood and boyhood: a longitudinal MRI written report". Nature Neuroscience. 2 (10): 861–863. doi:ten.1038/13158. PMID 10491603. S2CID 204989935.
  30. ^ Peters, R. (2006). "Ageing and the brain". Postgraduate Medical Journal. 82 (964): 84–8. doi:x.1136/pgmj.2005.036665. PMC2596698. PMID 16461469.
  31. ^ Kelley Hays; David South. (1998). Reader in Gender archaeology. Routlegde. ISBN9780415173605 . Retrieved 2014-09-21 .
  32. ^ Carne, Ross P.; Vogrin, Simon; Litewka, Lucas; Cook, Mark J. (January 2006). "Cerebral cortex: An MRI-based report of volume and variance with age and sex". Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 13 (1): threescore–72. doi:x.1016/j.jocn.2005.02.013. PMID 16410199. S2CID 20486422.
  33. ^ Taki, Y.; Thyreau, B.; Kinomura, S.; Sato, K.; Goto, R.; Kawashima, R.; Fukuda, H. (2011). He, Yong (ed.). "Correlations amidst Brain Grayness Affair Volumes, Age, Gender, and Hemisphere in Salubrious Individuals". PLOS ONE. 6 (vii): e22734. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...622734T. doi:x.1371/journal.pone.0022734. PMC3144937. PMID 21818377.
  34. ^ Giedd, Jay N. (Apr 2008). "The Teen Brain: Insights from Neuroimaging". Journal of Adolescent Health. 42 (iv): 335–343. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.01.007. PMID 18346658.
  35. ^ Rabinowicz, Theodore; Petetot, Jean MacDonald-Beachcomber; Gartside, Peter S.; Sheyn, David; Sheyn, Tony; de Courten-Myers, Gabrielle G. (Jan 2002). "Structure of the Cerebral Cortex in Men and Women". Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. 61 (1): 46–57. doi:10.1093/jnen/61.1.46. PMID 11829343. S2CID 16815298. ProQuest 229729071.
  36. ^ Alonso-Nanclares, 50.; Gonzalez-Soriano, J.; Rodriguez, J. R.; DeFelipe, J. (23 September 2008). "Gender differences in human cortical synaptic density". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.s. of America. 105 (38): 14615–14619. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10514615A. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803652105. JSTOR 25464278. PMC2567215. PMID 18779570.
  37. ^ Pakkenberg, Bente; Gundersen, Hans Jørgen Chiliad. (1997). "Neocortical neuron number in humans: Event of sex activity and age". Journal of Comparative Neurology. 384 (2): 312–320. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970728)384:2<312::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-K. PMID 9215725.
  38. ^ Skillful, Catriona D.; Johnsrude, Ingrid S.; Ashburner, John; Henson, Richard N.A.; Friston, Karl J.; Frackowiak, Richard Due south.J. (July 2001). "A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Ageing in 465 Normal Developed Homo Brains" (PDF). NeuroImage. xiv (1): 21–36. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0786. PMID 11525331. S2CID 6392260. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-eleven-17.
  39. ^ Peper, Jiska S.; Brouwer, Rachel Chiliad.; Boomsma, Dorret I.; Kahn, René S.; Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke Eastward. (June 2007). "Genetic influences on human brain structure: A review of brain imaging studies in twins". Human Encephalon Mapping. 28 (6): 464–473. doi:x.1002/hbm.20398. PMC6871295. PMID 17415783.
  40. ^ Zhang, Jianzhi (December 2003). "Evolution of the human being ASPM gene, a major determinant of encephalon size". Genetics. 165 (4): 2063–2070. doi:10.1093/genetics/165.4.2063. PMC1462882. PMID 14704186.
  41. ^ a b c Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (Feb 2012). "Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments" (PDF). American Psychologist. 67 (2): 130–159. doi:x.1037/a0026699. PMID 22233090. S2CID 7001642. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-12-xxx.
  42. ^ Mcdaniel, Thousand (July 2005). "Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence". Intelligence. 33 (4): 337–346. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2004.xi.005.
  43. ^ a b Luders, Eileen; Narr, Katherine Fifty.; Thompson, Paul G.; Toga, Arthur W. (March 2009). "Neuroanatomical correlates of intelligence". Intelligence. 37 (2): 156–163. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.07.002. PMC2770698. PMID 20160919.
  44. ^ Hoppe, Christian; Stojanovic, Jelena (August 2008). "High-Aptitude Minds". Scientific American Mind. 19 (4): lx–67. doi:x.1038/scientificamericanmind0808-60.
  45. ^ Allen, John South.; Damasio, Hanna; Grabowski, Thomas J. (August 2002). "Normal neuroanatomical variation in the human encephalon: An MRI-volumetric report". American Journal of Concrete Anthropology. 118 (4): 341–358. doi:ten.1002/ajpa.10092. PMID 12124914.
  46. ^ Egan, Vincent; Chiswick, Ann; Santosh, Celestine; Naidu, K.; Rimmington, J.Ewen; Best, Jonathan J.Yard. (September 1994). "Size isn't everything: A written report of brain book, intelligence and auditory evoked potentials". Personality and Private Differences. 17 (3): 357–367. doi:ten.1016/0191-8869(94)90283-half-dozen.
  47. ^ Egan, Vincent; Wickett, John C.; Vernon, Philip A. (July 1995). "Encephalon size and intelligence: erratum, addendum, and correction". Personality and Individual Differences. nineteen (1): 113–115. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00043-6.
  48. ^ Lee, H.; Devlin, J. T.; Shakeshaft, C.; Stewart, 50. H.; Brennan, A.; Glensman, J.; Pitcher, K.; Crinion, J.; Mechelli, A.; Frackowiak, R. S. J.; Green, D. West.; Price, C. J. (31 January 2007). "Anatomical Traces of Vocabulary Acquisition in the Adolescent Brain". Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (5): 1184–1189. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4442-06.2007. PMC6673201. PMID 17267574. S2CID 10268073.
  49. ^ Driemeyer, Joenna; Boyke, Janina; Gaser, Christian; Büchel, Christian; May, Arne (23 July 2008). "Changes in Gray Matter Induced by Learning—Revisited". PLOS I. 3 (seven): e2669. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...three.2669D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002669. PMC2447176. PMID 18648501. S2CID 13906832.
  50. ^ Ilg, R.; Wohlschlager, A. M.; Gaser, C.; Liebau, Y.; Dauner, R.; Woller, A.; Zimmer, C.; Zihl, J.; Muhlau, M. (16 Apr 2008). "Gray Matter Increase Induced by Exercise Correlates with Task-Specific Activation: A Combined Functional and Morphometric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study". Journal of Neuroscience. 28 (16): 4210–4215. doi:x.1523/JNEUROSCI.5722-07.2008. PMC6670304. PMID 18417700. S2CID 8454258.
  51. ^ Kevin Kelly. "The Technium: Brains of White Matter". kk.org.
  52. ^ Armstrong, E (17 June 1983). "Relative brain size and metabolism in mammals". Science. 220 (4603): 1302–1304. Bibcode:1983Sci...220.1302A. doi:10.1126/science.6407108. PMID 6407108.
  53. ^ Savage, V. Thousand.; Gillooly, J. F.; Woodruff, Westward. H.; Due west, Thou. B.; Allen, A. P.; Enquist, B. J.; Brown, J. H. (Apr 2004). "The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology". Functional Ecology. xviii (2): 257–282. doi:x.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00856.x.
  54. ^ Jerison, Harry J. (1973). Development of the Brain and Intelligence. Bookish Press. ISBN978-0-12-385250-2. [ page needed ]
  55. ^ Roth G, Dicke U (May 2005). "Evolution of the brain and intelligence". Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.). ix (v): 250–7. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.005. PMID 15866152. S2CID 14758763.
  56. ^ Finlay, Barbara Fifty.; Darlington, Richard B.; Nicastro, Nicholas (April 2001). "Developmental construction in brain evolution" (PDF). Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 24 (2): 263–278. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003958. PMID 11530543. S2CID 20978251. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-02-25.
  57. ^ Kappelman, John (March 1996). "The evolution of body mass and relative brain size in fossil hominids". Journal of Human Development. 30 (iii): 243–276. doi:10.1006/jhev.1996.0021.
  58. ^ Holloway, Ralph Fifty. (1996). "Toward a synthetic theory of human brain evolution". Origins of the Human being Brain. pp. 42–54. doi:x.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523901.003.0003. ISBN978-0-19-852390-1.
  59. ^ Roth, G; Dicke, U (May 2005). "Evolution of the encephalon and intelligence". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. ix (v): 250–257. doi:ten.1016/j.tics.2005.03.005. PMID 15866152. S2CID 14758763.
  60. ^ Motluk, Alison (28 July 2010). "Size isn't everything: The big encephalon myth". New Scientist.
  61. ^ Azevedo, Frederico A.C.; Carvalho, Ludmila R.B.; Grinberg, Lea T.; Farfel, José Marcelo; Ferretti, Renata E.L.; Leite, Renata East.P.; Filho, Wilson Jacob; Lent, Roberto; Herculano-Houzel, Suzana (10 April 2009). "Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain". The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 513 (5): 532–541. doi:10.1002/cne.21974. PMID 19226510. S2CID 5200449. Nosotros find that the adult male homo brain contains on average 86.ane ± viii.i billion NeuN-positive cells ("neurons") and 84.six ± 9.8 billion NeuN-negative ("nonneuronal") cells. [...] These findings challenge the common view that humans stand out from other primates in their brain limerick and indicate that, with regard to numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells, the human brain is an isometrically scaled-up primate brain.
  62. ^ Ross, Callum; Henneberg, Maciej (December 1995). "Basicranial flexion, relative brain size, and facial kyphosis inHomo sapiens and some fossil hominids". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 98 (four): 575–593. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330980413. PMID 8599387.
  63. ^ Logan, Corina J.; Clutton-Brock, Tim H. (Jan 2013). "Validating methods for estimating endocranial volume in individual red deer (Cervus elaphus)". Behavioural Processes. 92: 143–146. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.ten.015. PMID 23137587. S2CID 32069068.
  64. ^ Logan, Corina J.; Palmstrom, Christin R. (11 June 2015). "Can endocranial volume exist estimated accurately from external skull measurements in great-tailed grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus)?". PeerJ. 3: e1000. doi:x.7717/peerj.g. PMC4465945. PMID 26082858.
  65. ^ Rushton, J. Philippe; Jensen, Arthur R. (2005). "Thirty years of inquiry on race differences in cognitive ability". Psychology, Public Policy, and Constabulary. 11 (2): 235–294. CiteSeerXten.1.1.186.102. doi:x.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235.
  66. ^ "BBC News - Dark winters 'led to bigger human brains and eyeballs'". BBC News. 27 July 2011.
  67. ^ Alok Jha (27 July 2011). "People at darker, higher latitudes evolved bigger eyes and brains". the Guardian.
  68. ^ Stanford, C., Allen, J.S., Anton, South.C., Lovell, N.C. (2009). Biological Anthropology: the Natural History of Humankind. Toronto: Pearson Canada. p. 301
  69. ^ a b Pearce, Eiluned; Stringer, Chris; Dunbar, R. I. G. (7 May 2013). "New insights into differences in brain organization between Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 280 (1758): 20130168. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0168. PMC3619466. PMID 23486442.
  70. ^ Cohen, Jon (20 June 2018). "Exclusive: Neanderthal 'minibrains' grown in dish". Scientific discipline.
  71. ^ a b Michael Marshall (Feb 5, 2022). "160,000-year-old fossil may be the kickoff Denisovan skull nosotros've found". New Scientist.
  72. ^ a b Xiu-Jie Wu; et al. (Feb 2022). "Evolution of cranial capacity revisited: A view from the belatedly Eye Pleistocene attic from Xujiayao, People's republic of china". Periodical of Human Development. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103119.
  73. ^ Campbell, G.C., Loy, J.D., Cruz-Uribe, K. (2006). Humankind Emerging: 9th Edition. Boston: Pearson. p346
  74. ^ Holloway, Ralph 50., Yuan, M. S., and Broadfield, D.C. (2004). The Human Fossil Tape: Encephalon Endocasts: The Paleoneurological Evidence. New York. John Wiley & Sons Publishers (http://www.columbia.edu/~rlh2/PartII.pdf and http://www.columbia.edu/~rlh2/available_pdfs.html for further references).
  75. ^ Haile-Selassie, Yohannes; Melillo, Stephanie Grand.; Vazzana, Antonino; Benazzi, Stefano; Ryan, Timothy M. (12 September 2019). "A 3.viii-million-year-sometime hominin cranium from Woranso-Mille, Ethiopia". Nature. 573 (7773): 214–219. Bibcode:2019Natur.573..214H. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1513-8. hdl:11585/697577. PMID 31462770. S2CID 201656331.
  76. ^ Lieberman, Daniel. THE Development OF THE HUMAN HEAD. p. 433.
  77. ^ Lieberman, Daniel. THE EVOLUTION OF THE Human Head. p. 435.

Further reading [edit]

  • Jabr, Ferris (28 November 2015). "How Humans Concluded Up With Freakishly Huge Brains". Wired . Retrieved 29 November 2015.

Which Hominid Had The Largest Brain Size Measured In Cc (Cubic Centimeters)?,

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_size

Posted by: barclaygrance.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Which Hominid Had The Largest Brain Size Measured In Cc (Cubic Centimeters)?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel